OFFICE MANAGER’S PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING AND JOB PERFORMANCE (A STUDY OF DANGOTE CEMENT PORT HARCOURT)

ABSTRACT
This research work has examined office manager’s participation in decision making and job performance (a study of Dangote Cement Port Harcourt). The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of office manager’s participation on organizational performance, to find out ways/methods of introducing effective employee participation programmes in an organization, to determine the challenges those are associated with office manager’s participation, to examine the problems of not allowing office manager’s to participate in decision making that concern them. The survey design was used in obtaining data from management and Junior Staffs of Dangote cement Company in Port Harcourt. The primary sources involved the use of research instruments like questionnaire (structured and unstructured) and personal interview. The secondary sources involves various relevant material gotten from library, and manufacturing firms etc. simple percentage was used in analyzing data obtained. The research finding shows that office manager’s participation enhances job performance of the organization. Base on the finding summary, conclusion and recommendations were made that, management should realize that the employees are human in nature and as a matter of fact, should be treated with respect and recognition in the issue of common concern, management should always involve office manager’s in decision-making, especially in decisions that concerns them. This is necessary because of the positive and significant relationship between participation and office manager’s over all job performance, management should also involve officer manager’s in making decision during finding solutions to the problems of participation in the organization, office manager’s should perform their duties effectively when motivated management should also involve office manager at board level to help in making contributions that can help in advancing the level of performance in the organization.

TABLE OF CONTENT
ITLE PAGE i
CERTIFICATION iii
DEDICATION iv
ACKNOWLEDEGMENT v
ABSTRACT vi
TABLE OF CONTENT vii
CHAPTER ONE 1
INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 1
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS 2
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY 3
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 3
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTION 4
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 4
1.7 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY 5
1.9 DEFINITION OF TERMS 5
CHAPTER TWO 7
LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 INTRODUCTION 7
2.2 CONCEPT OF OFFICER MANAGER PARTICIPATION 7
2.3 WAYS OF OFFICE MANAGER’S PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING 8
2.4 MEANING OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING 11
2.5 MANAGEMENT FRAME OF REFERENCE AND COLLECTION BARGAINING 12
2.6 IMPORTANCE OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ORGANISATION 13
2.7 ADVANTAGES OF OFFICE MANAGER PARTICIPATION 13
2.8 OFFICE MANAGER PARTICIPATION AND JOB PERFORMANCES 14
CHAPTER THREE 18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 18
3.1 INTRODUCTION 18
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN 18
3.3 SOURCES OF DATA 18
3.3.1 PRIMARY SOURCE OF DATA 18
3.3.1 SECONDARY SOURCES OF DATA 19
3.4 POPULATION OF THE STUDY 19
3.5 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE 19
3.6 SAMPLE SIZE 19
3.7 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION 19
Table 1: Distribution and retrieval of questionnaire 20
3.8 METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS 21
3.9 VALIDATION OF THE INSTRUMENT 21
3.10 RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT 21
CHAPTER FOUR 22
DATA PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION 22
4.1 INTRODUCTION 22
Table 1: Office manager participation on organizational performance. 22
Table 2: Ways of introducing employee participation programmes 24
Table: 3. Challenges associated with employee participation 25
Table 4: None participation of employees in decision making. 27
4.7 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS 28
CHAPTER FIVE 31
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 31
5.1 SUMMARY 31
5.2 CONCLUSION 32
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS 32
REFERENCES 34
APPENDIX 1 35
APPENDIX II 36

CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Participation is the mental and emotional involvement of people in group situations that encourages them to contribute to group goals and share responsibility for them. There are three important ideas regarding participation in decision making involvement, contribution and responsibility. Firstly, participation means meaningful involvement rather than mere muscular activity. A second concept in participation is that it motivates people to contribute. They are empowered to release their own resources and creativity to achieve the objectives of the organization (Newstrom 2005). Participation especially improves job satisfaction by helping officer manager understand their paths towards goals.
Participation encourages people to accept responsibility for their group activities. It is social processes by which people become self involved in an organization and want to see it work successfully (Newstrom & Davis,2004).
Participation can have statistically significant effects on performance and job satisfaction (Wagner et al1997). Participate practices may provide power opportunities earlier to minority workers in an increasingly diverse workforce, since such workers need not wait until reaching higher organizational levels. It also helps to satisfy the awakening officer manager need for meaning and fulfillment at work. Participation typically brings higher output and a better quality of output. It tends to improve job satisfaction because workers feel more accepted and involved in the situation. Turnover and absences may be reduced if the workers feel that they have a better place to work (Newstrom& Davis, 2004).
Participation means interaction or discussion which aim is to achieve a set objective or trying to reach a decision. Decision is a choice between alternative goals or alternative means of achieving objectives.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
Many researchers have been carried out on workers participation in decision making. Research has shown that workers participation in decision making has a strong correlation to an organizational productivity. This study seeks to identify the level of performance as a result of workers participation in decision making. It is also aimed at identifying the different motivational impact which the participation of workers in decision making has brought on the workers themselves and the organization as whole.
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The main objective of this study is to examine officer manager participation in decision making and job performance.
Other objectives are as follows:
1. To examine the effect of officer manager participation on organizational performance.
2. To find out ways/methods of introducing effective officer manager participation programmes in an organization.
3. To determine the challenges those are associated with employee participation.
4. To examine the problems of not allowing officer manager to participate in decision making that concern them?
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study aims at contributing to the literature in employee participation in decision making and job performance. Also, this work on completion will broaden the essence workers participation in decision making in an organization.
Also, this work is intended to identify measures to be taken in allowing officer manager in an organization to participate in making decisions that concerns them.
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTION
The following research question is used to guide the researcher:
1. What is the effect of officer manager participation on organizational performance?
2. What are the ways/methods of introducing effective officer manager participation programmers in an organization?
3. What are the challenges that are associated with officer manager participation?
4. What are the problems of not allowing officer manager to participate in decision making that concern them?
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The scope of this research was confined to Dangote Cement Port Harcourt as it develops practices and policies to guide employee participation in decision making. It deals directly with the department of human resources.
1.7 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
This research work had some problems one of which was the lack of finds. This prevented the researcher from covering other organizations to have a wider view of the problem under study.
Also, the attitude of some of the respondents posed a lot of set back to the study; this was either incomplete of the questionnaire or inaptitude towards the researcher by the respondent.
Another was the limited time within the project work is expected to be completed coupled with other academic work at hand. This caused the researcher a great problem as he finds it difficult to cope with both at same time.
1.9 DEFINITION OF TERMS
Office Manager:

DECISION MAKING: Is a choice between alternative goals or between alternative means of objectives.
JOB PERFORMANCE: This is known as work, which a worker does in relation to establish the standard which is expected of him.
PARTICIPATION: Participation means interaction or decision which aim is to achieve a set objective or trying to reach a decision.

Complete Material Cost #3,000

Order for Complete material now