CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION (A STUDY OF SELECTED HOSPITALITY FIRMS IN RIVERS STATE)

Complete Material Cost #3,000

Order for Complete Material now

ABSTRACT

A lot of studies have been done on job satisfaction but none has been done on the impact of career development on employee job satisfaction. The primary purpose of this project is to establish whether career development opportunities have an impact on the levels of job satisfaction of employees.The population of interest in the study consisted of management staff in selected Hospitality firms in Rivers State which form a total population of 120 staff and a sample size of 92 was determined using Taro Yamenformula. Data was collected using a survey questionnaire. 92 copies of questionnaires were distributed to the staff of the Hospitality firms and 80 were filled and returned. The drop and pick method was used to collect the questionnaires. The data was analyzed using simple percentage and chi-square. The research revealed that all the employees were satisfied with their jobs and had the skills and knowledge to do their work all the respondents had at least a diploma .It was also evident that employees were satisfied with the career opportunities given to them by their organizations. This means Hospitality firms are doing all they can to provide various forms of development opportunities to their employees and consequently satisfy their employees. And for them to achieve maximum results they need to do carry out a salary survey to determine and correct the anomalies that exist to avoid turnover of the employees they have developed. Recommendations for the research focus on factors aimed at improving job satisfaction levels through various job satisfaction items in particular career development.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE……………………………………………………………………………………i

ABSTRACT        ii

DECLARATION iii

CERTIFICATION         iv

DEDICATION     v

ACKNOWLEDGMENT         vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS        vii

CHAPTER 1        1

INTRODUCTION         1

1.1     BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY  1

1.2     STATEMENT OF PROBLEM         5

1.3     OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY      6

1.4     RESEARCH QUESTIONS     6

1.5     RESEARCH HYPOTHESES  7

1.6     SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY  7

1.7     SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 8

1.8     DEFINITION OF TERMS      8

CHAPTER 2        10

LITERATURE REVIEW        10

2.1     CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK      10

2.1     THE CONCEPT OF CAREER AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT 10

2.2     IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING CAREER DEVELOPMENT      16

2.3     TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES       17

2.4     SUPERVISOR/MANAGER’S ROLE IN CAREER DEVELOPMENT      23

2.5     EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION 28

2.6     JOB SATISFACTION AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT     31

2.7     THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK     33

2.8     EMPIRICAL REVIEW  35

CHAPTER 3        38

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY      38

3.1     RESEARCH DESIGN   38

3.2     POPULATION OF THE STUDY     39

3.3     SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUE        40

3.4     QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN  42

3.5     SOURCES AND METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION         42

3.6     DATA ANALYTICAL METHOD    43

3.7     RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY     44

CHAPTER 4        46

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS       46

4.1     DATA PRESENTATION       46

4.2     DATA ANALYSIS        47

4.3     TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS……………………………………………………….52

4.4     DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS          55

CHAPTER 5        57

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS         57

5.1     SUMMARY         57

5.2     CONCLUSION    58

5.3     RECOMMENDATIONS         59

REFERENCES    61

APPENDIX I       63

APPENDIX II      64

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1     BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

In the era of globalization, and the emergence of new technologies, organizations are striving to survive and succeed in an environment where dramatic changes are taking place. Rightsizing, downsizing and resizing of organizations is occurring all around the world, including Africa. Organizations are restructuring themselves in order to keep abreast with the new business and economic developments. Employees and managers alike are being replaced and displaced in vast amount. Mergers and reengineering of business has seen the management layers being reduced to a few levels. The security of lifelong employment has also been challenged. Traditional approach to career path where seniority would ensure upward mobility along the career ladder is no longer assured. Lateral moves have become the most common way to reenergize the employees, as companies reduce the levels of management, decrease the number of workers employed, and increased the demand on those who remained (Mondy&Noe 1996). All these changes have put in place the much- celebrated concept of career development.

The changing demographics in the labor market have also given birth to a new breed of employees that differ in their outlook towards work and work life. Job and career changes are increasingly common due to the uncertainties of the economic environment, technological changes, and new attitudes toward work. Career change has become more socially acceptable as personal fulfillment is more highly valued. Other reasons that people seek change are that their initial career was not their choice, their original aspirations were not met, there is insufficient time for other life roles, or the present career is incongruent with changed values or interests (Kerka 1991). Employees are no longer eager to remain loyal to organizations if they can getbetter employment package elsewhere that can help them to fulfill their career aspirations. Herriot (1992) believed that the changes in the next decade, which has already occurred at present, threaten the very existence of many organizations.These changes are the technological change, changing demographics and education, information explosion, globalization, and concern about environment. It can be expected that career advancement opportunities have become more difficult in a global and local context and therefore demanding that more attention needs to be paid to it. This is particularly so in the light of the rapid change in the structure and occupations, some becoming obsolete and some new ones evolving as a result of technological developments, which necessitate two or three occupational changes in a persons work life now and certainly in the years to come. Only those organizations that negotiate careers and have provided suitable career development opportunities will keep the people they need to help them survive.

Job satisfaction has been one of the most extensively discussed and studied concepts in organizational and personnel management, accounting for more than 5000 published works. The information generated by research into this area has practical implications for individuals and organizations alike, as employees strive for the best quality of life possible and managers are faced with the ever- increasing challenge of operating efficient, effective organizations using the human and technological resources available to them. Understanding job satisfaction and what it means is not only a desirable but also a critical aspect of life for both organizations and individuals.

According to Cranny, Smith, & Stone (1992), job satisfaction is generally agreed upon by researchers to be an affective reaction to a job that results from the employee’s comparison of actual outcomes with those that are desired. Locke (1976) equates job satisfaction to morale of workers. Morale according to Guin (1958) is the extent to which the individuals’ needs are satisfied and how the employee views this satisfaction as coming from his/her work. Abraham Maslow’s (1943) theory of hierarchy of needs talks about self-esteem and in particular advancement as one ofthe motivating factors that individual’s look for in their work. Fredrick Herzberg’s (1975) motivation hygiene theory directly addresses the issue of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. He argues that motivation factors such as advancement opportunities and possibility of growth have the power to increase job satisfaction.

The rapid increase of global competition, day byday renewed technology, growing demand towards better customer service have made constant and fast change an important issue in organizations. Businesses in the present world are operating in a highly competitive and borderless environment. Survival has become a key focus for many of these businesses, and they are constantly seeking for ingredients that can help to establish their competitive advantage (Jayasingam& Yong 2013). Nowadays, managers and employers understand that they cannot obtain a good performance from their employees in a platform where both personal career management and organizational career management practices are absent. They realized that developing new methods is necessary, and they have to make a fundamental change in this matter. Otherwise, it is likely that their competitors will discover the secret power of workers and take action already. One of the roles of the human resource department is to help employees consider potential career routes (Agba, et al., 2010, p. 106). Together with efficiently using human resources that have a strategic importance for organizations, the effects of career development programs -that might provide a competitive advantage- and organizational commitment on the employee’s job satisfaction are chosen as the subject of this study. With no doubt, participation of managers and workers in the processes in the workplace and the necessity of giving responsibility and authority to workers in order to make the decisions applicable have become very crucial nowadays. Participation in decision-making is related to autonomy or empowerment, which are intrinsically motivating (Beehr, et al., 2009, p. 4). Companies that still embrace their old ways of operation, in other words, a centralized hierarchical level in a changing business world will eventually lose their workers and clients to the firms that embrace and internalize the new management style. Now, employees will desire to leave the companies that embrace the old management style and be on the side of employers who are willing to show more respect, give more autonomy and authority. One of the assumptions of the employees hold about their careers is the match between their aspirations and organization’s career system. Organizations sometimes do not seek the match; therefore, dissatisfaction and withdrawal may result (Cartwright, 2005, p. 40). In the modern businessworld nowadays, employers must find a way to notonly recompense for their employees’ labor and effort, but also to draw their souls into the workplace.

1.2     STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Restructuring has brought many changes in employment patterns. Whereas employees looked at job security and broad skills as the main source of job satisfaction restructuring has made organizations now less able to guarantee lifetime job security (Kerka. 1991). With mergers, acquisitions, restructuring and reengineering, Organizations find it difficult to invest in the long-term development oftheir employees. Furthermore the increasing tendency to adopt flatter structures caused by many waves of delayering has affected the ability of many organizations to guarantee promotional opportunities for their employees. This has greatly affected employee career development programs in these organizations .As a result many employees tend to have less satisfaction or lower satisfaction with their jobs (Cranny, et.al. 1992). Thus there appears to be a direct link between career development and job satisfaction yet no studies seem not have been done to address this linkage. This creates a gap in knowledge that the proposed study intends to fill.Job security and advancement are no longer guaranteed in the organizations yet no one has taken interest in the problem.

1.3     OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The main objective of the study is to determine the effect of career development on employee job satisfaction. However, there are some specific objectives which include:

  1. To establish the employee’s perceptions of career advancement opportunities in Hospitality firms in Rivers State.
  2. To determine job satisfaction levels of employees in Hospitality firms in Rivers State.
  3. To establish the relationship between perceptions of career advancement opportunities and job satisfaction of employees in Hospitality firms in Rivers State.

1.4     RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions will guide the researcher in her research.

  1. What is the extent of employee’s perception of career advancement opportunities in Hospitality firms in Rivers State?
  2. What is the extent of job satisfaction levels of employees in Hospitality firms in Rivers State?
  3. What is the relationship between perceptions of career advancement opportunities and job satisfaction of employees in Hospitality firms in Rivers State?

1.5     RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

Based on the research questions, the following null hypotheses are formulated.

H0: There is no significant relationship between employee’s perception of career advancement opportunities and job satisfaction of employees.

1.6     SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

Results of the study are expected to be useful to the following:

  • Management of Hospitality firms in Rivers State will for the first time understands and know the links between career advancement and job satisfaction.
  • Researchers who may be interested in this topic and may find the results opening up new avenues for further research.

The findings of this study will help managers in the selected Hospitality firms in appreciating the linkage between career development and employee job satisfaction, and the need to foster same using the potentials of their employees. Managers and practitioners in other organization will also benefit from the work with researchers interested in the area of career development and employee job satisfaction and the general public.

1.7     SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The scope of this study covers how career development affects employee job satisfaction in selected Hospitality firms in Rivers State. The selected Hospitality firms are Landmark Hotel, Presidential Hotel, Graceland Hotel and The Promise. The unit of analysis is based on individual levels which mean the interviews and the questionnaire would be administered to the individual staff of the firms in Rivers State.

Every research work has some limitations that can affect the overall research activities and research report. The researcher had limited time to complete the research. Combining lectures hours with the research work is indeed time demanding. The researcher also had limited resources that in some cases affected the overall completion of the research work. Limited finance and unwillingness of some of the respondents to provide useful information also affect the success of the research.

1.8     DEFINITION OF TERMS

Career: A person’s structured occupation and involves a steady of progressive advancements which includes how an individual’s work life develops overtime and how it is perceived by that person.

Development:The gradual growth of something so that it becomes more advance, stronger, etc; the process of producing or creating something new or more advanced; a new or advanced product.

Job Satisfaction:The good feeling, happiness or enjoyment that an employee have with his job.

Complete Material Cost #3,000

Order for Complete Material now