THE IMPACT OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING ON FIRM PERFORMANCE (A Study of Selected Banks in Port Harcourt)

Complete Material Cost #3,000

Order for Complete Material now

ABSTRACT

The study has examined the impact of relationship marketing on firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt. The survey research design was employed. The population of this study constitutes management and staffs of selected Banks in Port Harcourt which was unknown. The judgmental sampling technique was used for selecting the sample. The sample size of this study was 45 respondents which comprise of the senior and junior staff of selected Banks in Port Harcourt which include First Bank, Access Bank, FCMB and Fidelity Bank. In this study both the primary and secondary data were used. A questionnaire on the impact of relationship marketing management on firm’s performance was used and administered for the collection of data from the respondents. The data collected were processed electronically using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS). The statistical test used in the analysis of the data collected was the Chi-Square statistical tool. Findings amongst others revealed that direct marketing is associated with firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt. Relational Benefits is associated with firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.  Based on the findings of the study, we recommended that management should ensure that quality product and service are delivered to customers and management should also ensure that customers are serviced through electronic channels. This will allow the customer access their bank accounts, make transfers, internet banking, have access to self service at their convenient.

TABLE CONTENT

TABLE CONTENT       1

CHAPTER ONE  1

INTRODUCTION         1

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY     1

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM    3

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY          3

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS         4

1.5RESEARCH HYPOTHESES      4

1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY      5

1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 5

1.8 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY 6

1.9 DEFINITION OF TERMS          6

CHAPTER TWO 8

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE   8

2.1 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK         8

2.1.1 CONCEPT OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING 8

2.1.2 DIMENSIONS OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING    15

2.1.3 CONCEPT OF FIRMS PERFORMANCE  16

2.1.4 MEASURES OF FIRMS PERFORMANCE        17

2.1.5 RELATIONSHIP MARKETING AND FIRMS PERFORMANCE   18

2.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK        22

2.2.1 SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY     22

2.3 REVIEW OF RELATED EMPIRICAL STUDIES  24

2.4 SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW    25

CHAPTER THREE       26

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY      26

3.1 INTRODUCTION   26

3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN      26

3.3 POPULATION OF THE STUDY        26

3.4 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES USED     27

3.5 SAMPLE SIZE        27

3.6 SOURCE OF DATA         27

3.7 RESEARCH INSTRUMENT FOR DATA COLLECTION        27

3.8 VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF INSTRUMENT      28

3.9 TECHNIQUES FOR DATA ANALYSIS      28

CHAPTER FOUR         29

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS       29

4.1 QUESTIONNAIRE AND ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE   29

TABLE 4.1: QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTRATION AND RETRIEVAL       29

TABLE 4.2: SHOWING AGE OF RESPONDENTS    30

TABLE 4.3: SHOWING SEX OF RESPONDENTS     30

TABLE 4.4: SHOWING EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF RESPONDENTS    31

TABLE 4.5: SHOWING MARITAL STATUS OF RESPONDENTS        31

TABLE 4.6: SHOWING THE RESPONSE OF RESPONDENTS TO THE FIRST SET OF RESEARCH QUESTION.      32

TABLE 4.7: SHOWING THE RESPONSE OF RESPONDENTS TO THE SECOND SET OF RESEARCH QUESTION.      33

TABLE 4.8: SHOWING THE RESPONSE OF RESPONDENTS TO THE SECOND SET OF RESEARCH QUESTION.      34

TABLE 4.8: SHOWING THE RESPONSE OF RESPONDENTS TO THE SECOND SET OF RESEARCH QUESTION.      35

4.3 TEST OF HYPOTHESES:         36

4.4 DISCUSSION FINDINGS          38

CHAPTER FIVE 40

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION  40

5.1 INTRODUCTION   40

5.2 SUMMARY   40

5.3 CONCLUSION        40

5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS   41

REFERENCES    42

APPENDIX I       46

APPENDIX II      47

QUESTIONNAIRE       47

QUESTIONNAIRE       49

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

As oureconomybecomesmoreserviceandtechnologyoriented,thedynamicsofthesalesprocess willchanges.Theongoingnatureofservicesandthegrowingcomplexity oftechnology willincreasingly necessitatelengthyandinvolvedrelationships betweenbuyersandsellers.Thus,theseller‘sfocuswillneedto shiftfrom simplylandingsales toensuringbuyersatisfactionafterthepurchase.Tokeep buyers happy, vendors mustmaintainconstructive interactionwithpurchaserswhichincludeskeepingupontheircomplaints and futureneeds. Repeat orderswill go to those sellers who have done the best job or nurturing  these relationships…‖  Informationgatheredthroughcommunicationwithcustomerscanenableorganizationsto developamarketingmixthatismorelikelytocreatecustomersatisfaction.Withtheincreaseinthecompetition organizations realizethatwhatcustomer‘svalue,isnotalwaysjustlowerprices,butalsoexpectssuchas delivery,imageandbrandassociations, thelinkwithcustomers becomesincreasingly important.Whenthe marketgrowthslowsdownorasthemarketsbecomemorecompetitive, firmsaremorelikely toattemptto maintaintheir marketsharebyfocusingonretainingthecurrentcustomers.(Leeetal.,2001).

CustomerRelationshipManagement(CRM)Serviceisamarketingstrategythatensurestheacquisition andretentionofmostprofitablecustomersusingthemosteffectivemethod.Thus,tremendousgrowthof services sectorimplies  the role of marketingin terms of vast opportunitiesand implications,  marketing opportunitiesarisingfromnewtechnology,infranchisingfromfewerregulationsandprofessionalrestrictions, inservicingphysicalgoodsandinternationalmarkets(Lovelock, 1999). Therapidgrowthofservicesindustry haschangedtheconditions ofbusiness.Customerretentionhasbeenadvocatedasaneasierandmorereliable sourceofsuperiorperformance (ReichheldandSasser,1990).Ithasnowbecomecommon knowledgethatthe valueofallcustomersisnot same,the80/20ruleprevailswherebywehavelearned that20percentofcustomers generatemorethan80percentofrevenuesformostcompanies, anditisnotuncommontofindthataneven lowerpercentage ofcustomers cangeneratemorethan80to90percentoftherevenues. Undersuch circumstances, itisnotprudentforacompany toallocateequalresourcestoallcustomers.Customer segmentationandprogramdifferentiation isneededinordertomatchrevenuepotentialwithserviceofferings. Thosewithhigherrevenuepotentialdeserveagreaterallocationofcostsandservice.Otherwise,competitors willseizetheopportunity by offering better serviceandagreaterallocationofresourcesforthehigh-end customers.At thelower-end,attemptsshouldbemadetoachievecost savingsthroughthereallocationofefforts basedonless-expensive resources.Thiscanbedonewiththehelpofrelationship marketing strategystrategy. Itisbasedontheideathat thehappieracustomeriswitharelationship, thegreaterthelikelihoodthattheywillstaywithanorganization.

The ultimate aim of a Relationship marketing approach is for the customer to become a partner‘ of the organization, by contributing to marketing decisions through a one-to-one relationship.

Shani and Chalasani (1992) view Relationship marketing as an integrated effort to identify, maintain, and build up a network with individual consumers and to continuously improve the network for the benefits of all stakeholders, through interactive, personalized, and value-added contacts over a long period of time. From the foregoing therefore, the study is determined to examine the relationship between relationship marketing and firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

This study was determined to examine whether the practice of relationship marketing influences the performance of marketing organizations.

In this competitive and globalize age, customer of each organization is a crucial assets which the organization needs to preserve and expand for its profitability (Hanley, 2008). Many market researchers highlighted that loyal customers have an important contribution in market share and organizational profitability. It isa undoubted fact that loyal customers can be seen as the most vital factor of an organization to achieve the it’sfinancial performance in the long-term. In addition, transforming indifferent customers into loyal ones and establishing a long-term relationship with customers is crucial for business success. It is therefore, necessary to establish and maintain customer loyalty as a key to promote competitive advantage in the market place. Consequently, the maintenance of significant customers is a vital target which organizational management needs to understand to strengthen customer loyalty for the market.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

The main objective of the study is to examine the impact of relationship marketing on firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

  1. To examine the extent to which relationship quality influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.
  2. To examine the extent to which Relational Benefits influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.
  3. To examine the extent to which internal marketing influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.
  4. To examine the extent to which direct marketing influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

1.4 Research Questions

The following research questions were proposed to guide the study.

  1. To what extent is the term of relationship quality influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt?
  2. To what extent is the term of relational benefits influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt?
  3. To what extent is the term of internal marketing influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt?
  4. To what extent is the term of direct marketing influence firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt?

1.5     Research Hypotheses

The following hypotheses were formulated to guide the study:

Ho1: There is no significant relationship between relationship quality and firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

Ho2: There is no significant relationship between Relational Benefits and firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

Ho3: There is no significant relationship between internal marketing and firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

Ho4: There is no significant relationship between direct marketing and firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt.

1.6 Significance of the Study

Thestudyisexpectedtomakerecommendationstomarketing organizationmanagersonthe criticalrole of relationshipmarketing indoingtheirbusiness,particularlyinhighlycompetitivemarket as Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

It is to acknowledge that a study of this nature is carried out for some associated benefits it will help employers to ascertain the need for carrying out effective relationship marketing planning in the respective organizations.

The result/findings of this study will also open up the future for young practicing marketers to relationship marketing as a strategic marketing tool for better/improved organizational Performance. The study when completed will add to literature on relationship marketing.

1.7 Scope of the Study

The study is delimited under the following heading: content scope, geographical scope and unit of analysis.

Content Scope: The content scope of this study involves an investigation to ascertain the relationship between relationship marketing and firm’s performance among selected banks in Port Harcourt. The dependent variable is performance, measured by market share, sales volume and profitability. While independent variable is relationship marketing measured by relationship quality, relational benefits, direct marketing and internal marketing.

Geographical Scope:This study is delimited in Port Harcourt Rivers State with references to some selected commercial Banks.

Unit of Analysis: The unit of analysis in this research involves both senior and Junior staffs of selected Banksin Port Harcourt.

1.8 Limitation of the Study

In carrying out an investigation of this nature the researcher must of necessity be faced with some constraint the, include;

Time Constraint:The time frame provision for this study was too short.

Financial constraints: Usually, a study of this nature involved some level of expenditure therefore; finance was also a limiting factor.

Poor response:The poor response from the respondent and inability to access the entire population also was another constrain to the study.

1.9 Definition of Terms

Relationship marketing: Relationship marketing is a facet of customer relationship management (CRM) that focuses on customer loyalty and long-term customer engagement rather than shorter-term goals like customer acquisition and individual sales.

Marketing: The action or business of promoting and selling products or services, including market research and advertising.

Firm’s performance: The action or business of promoting and selling products or services, including market research and advertising.

Market share: The portion of a market controlled by a particular company or product.

Profitability: It is the ability of a business to earn a profit. A profit is what is left of the revenue a business generates after it pays all expenses directly related to the generation of the revenue, such as producing a product, and other expenses related to the conduct of the business activities.

Complete Material Cost #3,000

Order for Complete Material now