Abstract
The study is determined to examine the relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment. The objectives of the study are to examine the relationship between promotion and organizational commitment, to examine the relationship between job transfer and organizational commitment, to examine the relationship between HRM relocation and organizational commitment and to examine the relationship between Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.The survey approach was adopted. The study was designed to focus on some selected commercial banks in Port Harcourt metropolis Rivers State which include First Bank, GT Bank and Union Bank. The population of the study was made to be one hundred (100). A Self-designed questionnaire job rotationt and organizational commitment was used and administered for the collection of data. The Yaro Yemen’s formula was used to determine the sample size of 80. The simple percentage was used to analyze the response. The Chi-Square statistical tool was used to test the hypothesis. Findings amongst others reveals that there is a significant relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment. Based on the findings of the study summary, conclusion and recommendations were made that there is need to consider an appropriate weight for job rotation in commitment evaluation programs as a crucial executive indicator and managers need to provide opportunities for increasing job satisfaction and motivation; decreasing absenteeism and job quitting; promoting tendency to participate and learn and finally increasing commitment to goals providing opportunities for team operational work and help improving productivity in the organization.
Table of Contents
TITLE PAGEi
Declarationii
Certificationiii
Dedicationiv
Acknowledgementi
Abstractii
Table of Contentsiii
List of Tablesv
List of Figurevi
CHAPTER 1 1
INTRODUCTION1
1.1 Background of the Study1
1.2 Statement of Problems3
1.3 Objectives of the Study4
1.4 Research Questions4
1.5 Research Hypothesis5
1.6 Significance of the Study5
1.7 Scope/Delimitations of the Study5
1.8 Definition of Terms6
CHAPTER 28
LITERATURE REVIEW8
2.1 Conceptual Framework8
2.1.1 Concept of Job Rotation9
2.1.2 Dimensions of Job Rotation11
2.1.3 Organizational Commitment13
2.1.4 Measures of Organizational Commitment14
2.2 Theoretical Framework16
2.3 Empirical Framework18
CHAPTER 322
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY22
3.1 Research Design22
3.2 Population of the Study23
3.3 Questionnaire Design23
3.4 Source and Method of Data Collection24
3.5 Sample and Sampling Techniques25
3.6 Data Analytical Techniques26
3.7 Reliability and Validity27
CHAPTER 428
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS28
4.1 Data Collection and Presentation28
4.2 Data Analysis29
4.3 Testing of Hypothesis34
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS34
CHAPTER 537
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS37
CHAPTER 639
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS39
6.1 Summary39
6.2 Recommendations40
REFERENCES41
APPENDIX I46
APPENDIX II47
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
In today’s rapid pace of technological advancement, job consistency and people repeated tasks do not have the needed efficiency and effectiveness (Akhbari and Zargarani, 2011). As a management approach in the area of human resource management, job rotation helps managers to relocate employees conditionally and pertinently in different positions with different incentives (Mirsepasi, 2014). Management scholars believe that job rotation contributes to enhance employees’ capabilities and their perspectives (Ho et al., 2009). Taking advantage of job rotation techniques based on efficient production strategies, organizations can keep employees motivated and take the required steps toward enriching jobs, reducing ergonomic effects, improving job skills, etc. (Akhbari and Zargarani, 2011).
Job rotation is a way of designing jobs for employees to learn the required skills from different departments and get rid of exhaustion arising from repeated tasks. Facing new tasks and roles will revive and refresh employees and boost their morale (Jorgensen et al. 2005, quoted byNasiripour et al. 2009). According to research conducted by diplomatic managers and officials, one way of raising employees’ motivation is to have a tool such as job rotation to affect operators’ performance and improve their commitment to their work (Mohsan, Musarrat Nawaz& Sarfraz Khan, 2012).
Agreeing on job rotation in organizations is following by different beliefs and reliable data forming the principles of decision-making (Muller, 2010). By correctly planning for relocation, organizations can solve human resource problems, lead employees’ to have positive perception of their job and organization, and at the same time reduce improper organizational behaviors (such as leaving,
absence, and working poor). It is, thus, clear that job rotation is not only an ideal but an undeniable necessity (Majidi, 1987). The importance of job rotation is relatively known to all companies around the world. It is a good approach for organizations to develop employees, managers and executives (Mohsan, Musarrat Nawaz & Sarfraz Khan, 2012). As an alternative tool for designing jobs, job rotation helps in recognition of different skills of different jobs, and to eliminate employees’ fatigue resulting from doing boring tasks. New challenges motivate employees to improve their outputs by boosting their morale (Jorgensen, 2005). It is a process of in-service training to develop future managers by moving from a situation to another to enhance their perception and credit in different contexts (Seibert et al. 2001, quoted by Majidi, 1987). Job rotation is different from training strategies in which employees learn their tasks. It though intensifies their flexibility (Burke & Moore, 2000).
Organizational authors claim that rotating employees from a unit to another is not costly but a necessity to the professional conditions defined as a chance to do tasks in higher levels, to take advantage of higher job benefits and to raise their job performance (Leat, 2007).
Job rotation is a systematic change of employees from a position to another within planned intervals (Dessler & Varkkey, 2009, quoted by Malinski, 2002). Job rotation is a good tool for motivating employees and increasing their commitment to and involvement in a job profitable for organizational effectiveness (Zeira, 1974).
Organizational Commitment as theorized in the three forms identified in literature, as affective, continuance, and normative commitment ( Mowday et al, 1979; Simmons, 2005; Tsai & Huang, 2008; Islam et al, 2012; Khan et al, 2013). Organizational commitment is a condition in which an employee recognizes himself/herself with a particular organization and its objectives, and wants to remain its participant.
Organizational commitment is not a complementary concept. Allen and Mayer refer to three dimensions of affective commitment, continuous commitment, and normative commitment, all connecting employees to their organization (Sethi & Seth, 2009). Organizational commitment is a multidimensional psychic-mental situation delineating people’s relation with their organization (Gormley & Kennerly, 2010).
Accordingly and with regard to the undeniable necessity of organizational disorders, this paper aims to assess the effect of job rotation – as a tool for human resource management – and study individual and organization consequences.
1.2 Statement of Problems
Job rotation is one of the best way of motivating employees by diversifying their activities. This also lengthens the life of organizations which are equipped with higher skilled employees and helps management to act more flexibly (Sanali, Bahron & Oscar, 2013).
Having flexible, handy and skillful employees is a wish for any manger and system. Such people in any organization provide a good ground for facilitating and expediting works, and saving time and resources. One important approach to accomplish this is job rotation (Seyedjavadin, 2013).
Therefore, problems identified in the study are;
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The main objective of the study is to examine the relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment. The specific objectives are as follows:
i. To examine the relationship between promotion and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.
ii. To examine the relationship between job transfer and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.
iii. To examine the relationship between HRM relocation and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.
iv. To examine the relationship between Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.
1.4 Research Questions
i. To what extent does promotion influence organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt?
ii. What is the extent to which job transfer influence organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt?
iii. Does human resources relocation influence and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt?
1.5 Research Hypothesis
HO: There is no significant relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.
HA: There is a significant relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment in selected commercial Banks in Port Harcourt.
1.6 Significance of the Study
This study is significant in the following ways;
Firstly, it will assist the organization to continually plan for the good of their employee’s and also make use of job rotation system to enhance commitment for the good of the organization.
Others who will benefit from this study include, managers, business organizations, higher institutions and the society in general. The study will also add to literature on the subject matter.
1.7 Scope/Delimitations of the Study
The study is delimited under the following heading: content scope, geographical scope and unit of analysis.
1. Content Scope: The content scope of this study involves an investigation to ascertain the relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment. The dependent variable is organizational commitment, measures by affective commitment, continuance commitment and normative commitment. While independent variable is job rotationmeasure by promotion, job transfer, human resources relocation and job satisfaction.
2. Geographical Scope:This study is delimited in Port Harcourt Metropolis with special reference to some selected commercial banks which include First Bank, GT Bank and Union Bank.
3. Unit of Analysis: The unit of analysis in this research involves the individuals at the time of carrying out the study. The scope of this study is to ascertain the relationship between job rotation and organizational commitment.
In carrying out an investigation of this native the researcher must of necessity be faced the following constraint.
Firstly, the time constraint’s the time frame provision for this study was short.
Secondly, financial constraints. Usually, a study of this nature involved some level of expenditure therefore, finance was also a limiting factor.
Thirdly, poor response from the respondent and inability to access the entire population of the study. In the next segment significance of the study will be discussed. Lastly, poor measurement instrument.
In the next segment, definition of the study will be discussed.
1.8 Definition of Terms
There is need for every work in a research proposal and of course in any research report to be clear as to its meaning, since words have different meaning in different context.
Job rotation: It is a technique used by employers that would use this method on their employees to rotate their assigned jobs throughout their employment.
Commitment: The state or quality of being dedicated to a cause, activity, etc.
Organization: An organized group of people with a particular purpose, such as a business or government department.
Organizational commitment: It is the individual’s psychological attachment to the organization.
Complete Material cost #3,000
Order Complete material now