Complete Material Cost #3,000
This study examined the relationship between industrial conflict on corporate survival, using some selected manufacturing firms in Port Harcourt as survey point. In the course of carrying out the study, the primary and secondary data sourcing methods were adopted. The primary has to do with structured and unstructured questionnaires, personal materials and observations, while the secondary data were sourced from existing materials such as textbooks, journals, library materials, corporate magazines and internet materials. The population of the study is made up of 150 staff of the two, manufacturing firms under investigation out of which a sample size of 73 respondents was drawn via the Yaro Yamen formula. The Chi-square statistical tool was used for the analysis of the study data, especially in testing the hypothesis. In our finding it was revealed that industrial conflict negatively impact on the survival of organizations. Based on this, it is recommended that manufacturing firms should always provide adequate facilities to enable the employees to be motivated when doing their job and also train the subordinate and develop the super ordinates on how to make use of the equipment in the various departments and to improve skills with maximum efficiency and high productivity.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page I
Table of Contents Vi
Chapter 1 1
1.1 Background To The Study 1
1.2 Statement Of The Problem 5
1.3 Objectives Of The Study 6
1.4 Research Questions 7
1.5 Research Of Hypothesis 7
1.6 Significance Of The Study 8
1.7 Scope And Determination Of The Study 9
1.8 Limitation Of The Study 9
1.9 Definition Of Terms 10
Chapter 2 11
Review Of Related Literature 11
2.1 Concept Of Industrial Conflicts 12
2.2 Dimension Of Industrial Conflict 13
2.2.1 Confrontation 13
2.2.2 Containment 15
2.2.3 Concept Of Corporate Survival 16
2.3 Measures Of Corporate Survival 17
2.3.1 Diversification 17
2.3.2 Market Share 20
2.3.3 Industry Condition 22
2.4 Concept Of Organizational Culture 24
2.4.1 Factors Affecting Organization Culture 25
2.4.2 How Industrial Conflict Affect The Organization’s Culture 27
2.5 Types Of Organizational Conflict 27
2.6 Industrial Conflict And Corporate Survival 29
2.7 Causes Of Industrial Conflict In An Organization 30
2.7.1 Solution Of The Causes Of Industrial Conflict In An Organization 31
2.8 Theoretical And Empirical 32
Chapter 3 37
Research Methodology 37
3.1 Research Design 37
3.2 Population Of The Study 39
3.3 Sample And Sampling Techniques 39
3.4 Questionnaire Design 41
3.5 Sources And Method Of Data Collection 42
3.6 Data Analytical Method 43
3.7 Reliability And Validity 44
Chapter 4 46
Data Presentation And Analysis 46
4.1 Data Presentation 46
4.2 Data Analysis 50
4.3 Testing Of Hypothesis 53
Chapter 5 57
Discussion Of Findings 57
5.1 Discussions 57
Chapter 6 59
Summary, Conclusions And Recommendations 59
6.1 Summary 59
6.2 Conclusions 60
6.3 Recommendations 62
Appendix I 67
Appendix Ii 68
1.1 Background to the Study
The current study of industrial conflict is dominated by attempts of scholars to explain the prevalence of industrial conflict in sectors and countries for example; a prominent question in the industrial relation, literature is “why do than other countries” The actual effects of strikes although kindly recognized in the literature have received much less systematic scholarly attention. If a strike occurs, this may have profound effect beyond the actual industrial conflict, and beyond, the stakes of the participant in bargaining.
Conflicts are inevitable part of organizational life since the goals of different stakeholders such as managers and staffs are often incompatible. Conflict is an unpleasant fact in any organization as long as people complete for jobs, resources, power recognition and security.
Organizational conflict can be regarded as a dispute that occurs when interest, goals or values of different individuals or groups are incompatible with each other (2). This results into a situation whereby they frustrate each other in an attempt to achieve their objective.
Conflict arises in groups because of scarcity of freedom, position and resources. People who value independent tend to resist the need for independence and to some extent, confirmed within a group who seek power, therefore struggle with others or position or status within the group. Unfortunately, the term “conflict” has only the connotation of “bad” for many people, so much so that they think principally in terms of suppression, giving little or no attention to its more positive side.
Conflict is the heart of industrial relations and may form the necessary starting point for any serious analysis in industrial relations.
Conflict refers to an opposition of interest of perspective. In other word, conflict exists whenever incompatible activities occur. Industrial conflict therefore refers to the total range of behaviour and attitude that express opposition and divergent orientation between management and workers.
Industrial conflict may take the form of peaceful bargaining and grievance handling or it could be inform of boy (strike) restriction of output, sabotage, absenteeism and personal turnover, according to Clark (1964). Therefore, there are many ways in which conflict is manifested in an organization. Strike is principally an overt (open) manifestation and the most spectacular and conspicuous industrial conflicts but may be divided into two broad classes-informal and formal industrial conflict is labeled from a sense of grievances and supposedly is wholly expressed in nature.
Industrial sociologist have also regarded spontaneous walk outs and strikes example of informal corporate conflict, as well as the constant opposition to management, expressed in work group norms regulating output, restrictive practices secrecy or other behaviour which many appear incomprehensive from the point of view of management that is used too widely, however, it loses it value.
The problem of industrial relations is therefore to deal or rather cope constructively with conflict which are inevitable in organizations, such as the trade unions for dealing with conflict and the federal government of Nigeria through labour laws provided the necessary framework and guide line within which trade union must relates to each other for the purpose of achieving industrial harmony and economic progress. But despite those provisions, conflict its continue to flare up periodically. Therefore, the crux of the problem identified is that despite the painstakingly draw-up agreements and the statutory provision of the Nigerian labour laws, conflicts still exist and flare quite frequently in many organization (Flippo, 1986).
The re-opener claves can however, be involved whenever the need arise (Fox, 1976). They therefore recognize the importance of negotiation and consultations. Thus as part of the strategies for maintain industrial harmony, union meeting are convened quarterly and there is also a provision for emergency meeting. According to Akpala (1982), all the activities of any organization are indicated and determined by the persons who make up that organization, offices, computer and all that a modern firm uses are unproductive, except for human effort and the process managing the human component, the central most important task depends on how it is done. Shell, NNPC and Agip are essentially of team of firms which depend on the effectiveness of every member performing their function strictly according to how it is schedule and according to how it’s schedule to accomplish the interest between labour and management (Hare, 1996).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Industrial conflict is the dissatisfaction that arises from the interaction between the labour and management in the workplace while employee’s performance is the success of work which further the success of the organization for which one is employed. It is imperative that manager must first hire employee with the right skills and qualification for the job. One the hiring process is complete the manager seeks to ensure that an employee work is closely aligned with the organization goals and objective. For employee to equitably satisfy the needs of the organization, it is required from the organization’s point of view that the employee’s needs are also met. But in most cases, the organization does not often meet the demands of the employee which in turn, causes conflicts between the parties. It is against this background that this study is designed to evaluate the impact of industrial conflict on corporate survival.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The main objective of this study is the determination of the relationship between industrial conflict and corporate survival in selected manufacturing firms in Port Harcourt.
The specified objectives of the study are:
To ascertain the relationship between conformation and corporate survival.
To determine the relationship between containment and corporate survival.
To determine the influences of culture on the relationship between industrial conflict and corporate survival.
1.4 Research Questions
The following research questions is designed to guide the study is achieve its objectives.
1) To what extent does confrontation influences corporate survival?
2) To what extent does containment influences corporate survival?
3) To what extent does organizational culture influences the relationship between industrial conflict and corporate survival?
1.5 Research of Hypothesis
Upon the note of the above research questions, the following research hypotheses are proposed:
1) Ho: there is no significant relationship between industrial conflict and corporate survival
2) HoA: Organizational culture does not moderates the relationship between industrial conflict and corporate survival.
1.6 Significance of the Study
The aim of this study is to examine the sources of organizational conflicts and its effects on organizational performance. It specifically tries to examine in detail, the causes, types, effects and recommend various strategies on how to resolve industrial conflicts to entrance organizational performance.
Conflict between individuals may result from role-related pressures. Conflicts would arise between individuals and group of the goals are not specified for individuals within a group (Duke, 1999). Additionally, the following are other sources of conflicts within an organization namely: sharing of resources especially manpower, money materials, equipment and space required among departments. Resources are very scarce, people will always have to compete for them and the end result will lead to conflict. Independent may also lead to conflict; this usually occurs when two or more units depend on one another to complete work of a product especially when a product passes through stages, one unit might delay the outcome of the whole product.
1.7 Scope and Determination of the Study
This study is majorly focused on the effect of industrial conflict and corporate survival with a case of selected manufacturing firms in Port Harcourt.
- Content Scope:
- Geographical Scope:
- Unit of Analysis:
1.8 Limitation of the Study
This study like any other research work was faced with many financial constraints: insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials literature or information and in the process of data collection through the internet, questionnaire and interview.
Time Constraint: The research simultaneously engaged in this study with other academic work. This consequently cut down on the time devoted for the research work in selected manufacturing firms in Port Harcourt.
1.9 Definition of Terms
The following terms are operationally defined as follows;
Confrontation: Is the angry disagreement you might because so impetrated about your upstairs neighbor, loud awful music a confrontation is unavoidable.
Containment: Is the direct expression of one’s view (thoughts and feelings) at the conflict situation and an invitation for the other party to express his or her view of the conflict.
Diversification: The primary goals all business ventures without problem.